Teams

Westlake

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 5.0+

9 players · average NTRP 5.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20vs Braemar (SFV)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Wilde / Andrew Whitehouse vs Federico Rolon / David Graziani6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIlya Bolotsky vs Gilbert Chung1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Whitehouse / Tyler Davis vs Andrew Rogers / Kevin Marks6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTrenton Nield vs Garrett Patton1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMax Nudell / Matteo Savio vs Martin Parkes / Blake Anthony6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesChris Dudeck / Andrew Whitehouse vs Sam Querrey / Martin Parkes2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTrenton Nield vs Arnau Dachs Vaque4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMax Nudell / Tyler Davis vs Brant Benun / Blake Anthony7-6, 7-5
2025-11-08vs Braemar (SFV)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Whitehouse / Cruz Thayne vs Natan Spear / Thanos Kantarelis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIlya Bolotsky vs Gilbert Chung6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSean Sabat / Steve Wilde vs Bruce Man-Son-Hing / Michael Burr7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs Braemar (SFV)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChris Dudeck / Andrew Whitehouse vs YAHN GAWRIT / Joshua Quijano7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTrenton Nield vs Joshua Friedman6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSean Sabat / Steve Wilde vs Golan Sassoon / Federico Rolon2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTrenton Nield / Matteo Savio vs Andrew Rogers / Daniel Sutman4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesIlya Bolotsky vs Garrett Patton6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Wilde / Cruz Thayne vs Kevin Marks / Brant Benun6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ilya Bolotsky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 6
Andrew Whitehouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Cruz Thayne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.73
Chris Dudeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Steve Wilde
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Matteo Savio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Max Nudell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Sabat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trenton Nield
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Wilde + Sean Sabat123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

6
Ilya Bolotsky
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Andrew Whitehouse
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Cruz Thayne
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Chris Dudeck
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.73
Steve Wilde
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
Matteo Savio
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Max Nudell
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Sabat
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trenton Nield
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.