Teams

Mixed Up II

Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 North Mixed Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2020-12-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanice Huang / Daniel Higgins vs Elizabeth Mutisya / Dan Khoo6-1, 6-4
2020-11-21vs NJD/Mixed UpSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristina Baldovino / Dan Khoo vs Sonali Chahal / Allan Orchard3-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Martz / Alan Tucker vs Elise Gerdes / Tyler Harris5-7, 4-6
2020-11-14vs 8.0 Chester MixLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristina Baldovino / David Harris vs Joanna Goldin / Jerry Taylor4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Ferrara / Dan Khoo vs Amy Han / Thomas Han6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Martz / Daniel Higgins vs Ling Pang / Kin Chin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-07vs Hot Mix 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAlan Tucker / Jennifer Martz vs Valerie Tchikanda / Ravi Vaidyanathan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJayamadhuri Ghosh / Peter Dussias vs Alan Howard / Serena-G Xu1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesManju Adusumilli / Dan Khoo vs Ramaswami Venkatesh / Janet Bellaran7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2020-10-25vs Gr8t SalukisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Pangis / Gerald Sarmiento vs Laura Fiske / Mohan Duggi6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Martz / Alan Tucker vs Jaclyn Kulich / Jorge Vergara6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJayamadhuri Ghosh / DAISUKE SUZUKI vs Mary Chion / Nui Chan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2020-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Higgins / Izabela Duda vs John Alonzo / Lee Altman-Spear6-2, 6-3
2020-10-17vs NJD/Mixed UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Martz / Daniel Higgins vs Emily Roeper / Tyler Harris4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Ferrara / David Harris vs Sonali Chahal / Zachary Anderson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJayamadhuri Ghosh / Wazim Khan vs Cecilia Orchard / John Doe2-6, 3-6
2020-10-10vs 8.0 Chester MixLost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Pangis / Gerald Sarmiento vs Amy Han / Arunrahul Nallaswami5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRisa Kaban / Ron Forzani vs Joanna Goldin / Thomas Han0-6, 4-6
2020-10-03vs Hot Mix 8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Ferrara / Dan Khoo vs Olga Carey / Chris Moran5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Higgins / Jennifer Martz vs Linh Fruge / Zhaohui Yang3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristina Baldovino / David Harris vs Rudolf van Mol / JANET van MOL6-2, 7-5
2020-10-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Higgins / Izabela Duda vs Michael Bzdak / Ann Astolfi6-1, 6-3
2020-09-19vs Gr8t SalukisWon 21
W#1 DoublesManju Adusumilli / Dan Khoo vs Meng Zhang / David Nguyen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Martz / Daniel Higgins vs Mary Chion / Nui Chan6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristina Baldovino / David Harris vs Jaclyn Kulich / Jorge Vergara6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 North Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJD/Mixed Up0819513168
28.0 Chester Mix0816820176
3Hot Mix 8.008101432227
4Mixed Up II0891533238
5Gr8t Salukis0861838253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
DAISUKE SUZUKI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Jared Kaban
published
3.80
Christine Ferrara
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Kristina Baldovino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Dan Khoo
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Ron Forzani
published
3.64
Sue Pangis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jayamadhuri Ghosh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Martz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Kristy Gilbert
published
Manju Adusumilli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Risa Kaban
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Wazim Khan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Martz + Daniel Higgins2352% gamesnot enough data
Kristina Baldovino + Dan Khoo123 matchesnot enough data
Dan Khoo + Jennifer Martz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
DAISUKE SUZUKI
10W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
4.38
Jared Kaban
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Christine Ferrara
91W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Kristina Baldovino
50W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dan Khoo
143W–145L career · 14 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Ron Forzani
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Sue Pangis
278W–219L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Daniel Higgins
51W–34L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jayamadhuri Ghosh
41W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Martz
46W–41L career · 16 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristy Gilbert
29W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Manju Adusumilli
110W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Risa Kaban
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wazim Khan
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.