Teams

GOLDMAN TC 40AW3.5C

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-13vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMiriam DeQuadros / Meredith Wong vs Nancy Wu / Daphne Zenk1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMirella Bucci / Miriam DeQuadros vs Lisa Faber / Sharon Klein3-6, 3-6
2024-01-17vs CALIFORNIA TC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Lisa Gumpert5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Catherine Saul
published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Harvey
published
3.22
Mirella Bucci
published
3.21
3.20
Karen Brandman
published
3.14
Kelly Alberta
published
3.13
Tomoko Kunita
published
3.04
Jolinda Gladstein
published
2.97
Christina Ng
published 3
2.95
Meredith Wong
published
2.93
K Janelle Lee
published
2.74
Mary Kane
published
2.69
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.59
Jeri Chu
published
Stefanie Sheridan
published
Susan Spies
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.5% vs expected
Meredith Wong + Stephanie Harvey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Catherine Saul
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stephanie Harvey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Mirella Bucci
16W–35L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Jessica Pfannenstiel
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
Karen Brandman
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tomoko Kunita
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Jolinda Gladstein
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Christina Ng
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.97
Meredith Wong
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
K Janelle Lee
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Mary Kane
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Jeri Chu
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Stefanie Sheridan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Spies
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.