Teams

Ca.Pena18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs Na.Wireback18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesClifton Minsley vs Andrew Chan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChris Mann vs Shawn Murphy7-6, 6-1
L#3 SinglesPablo Koe-Krompecher vs Joseph Hollingsworth2-6, 5-7
2026-07-15vs Sp.Johnson18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesScott Underwood vs Spencer Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesClifton Minsley vs Hanzhang Liu6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesPablo Koe-Krompecher vs Stephen Marley6-4, 6-3
2026-07-11vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesScott Underwood vs Chris Wandor6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPablo Koe-Krompecher vs John-Michael O'Neill6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDavid Dare vs Hamilton Garvey7-6, 6-0
2026-06-27vs Ry.Sheppard18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDoug Silverman vs Ryan Sheppard1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSeb Heese vs Jeron Russell6-4, 6-2
2026-06-11vs Na.Wireback18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSeb Heese vs Brady Sowers6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesChris Mann vs Daniel Grassinger1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-05vs Sp.Johnson18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChris Mann vs William Anderson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesClifton Minsley vs Austen Berry1-6, 6-7
2026-05-28vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesPablo Koe-Krompecher vs Brendon Dorgan6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesClifton Minsley vs Nick Martinelli0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDoug Silverman vs Aashal Dave7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ry.Sheppard18S6117412149
2Ca.Pena18S4313817158
3Na.Wireback18S3371124167
4Sp.Johnson18S2461227182
5Ma.Roschel18S1551326180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Scott Underwood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.95
Seb Heese
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.87
Chris Mann
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Pablo Koe-Krompecher
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Camilo Pena
published 4
3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.54
Clifton Minsley
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.51
David Dare
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Underwood
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Seb Heese
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Chris Mann
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Pablo Koe-Krompecher
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Camilo Pena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
4
Clifton Minsley
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
David Dare
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.