Teams

Ri.Pfeiffer55C

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesDayn Harum / Clay Garst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-06vs Ja.Sage55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlan Crews / Dayn Harum vs Tony Houser / Nile Testerman6-1, 7-5
2025-09-22vs To.Morrow55CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesScott McElreath / Craig Pleasants vs Praveen Chandrasekhar / W Troutman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBradley Ransome / Dayn Harum vs Erik J Erikson / Bryan Simpson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Ja.Sage55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Greg Cooper vs John Gearing / Mark Camacho0-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Jo.Diamond55C8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesBradley Ransome / Dayn Harum vs Jeffrey Monaghen / Hai Le6-1, 6-3
2025-08-25vs To.Morrow55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott McElreath / Clay Garst vs Mark Brockmann / Tom Morrow6-3, 6-2
2025-08-21vs Jo.Diamond55C8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Bell / Dayn Harum vs Hai Le / David Anderson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott McElreath / James Greer vs Ken Nowell / John Diamond6-2, 7-5
2025-08-18vs Ja.Sage55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesClay Garst / Dayn Harum vs Ken Klocke / John Wagner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Bell / Scott McElreath vs Nile Testerman / Jason Sage6-1, 6-3
2025-08-04vs To.Morrow55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Bell / Dayn Harum vs Erik J Erikson / Bryan Simpson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Clay Garst
published 4.5
4.09
Bradley Ransome
published 4.5
3.95
Dayn Harum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.84
Scott McElreath
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Mark Combs
published
3.72
Michael Marchi
published
3.71
Alan Crews
published 4
3.50
Greg Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott McElreath + Dayn Harum5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Garst
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Bradley Ransome
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4
Dayn Harum
70W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Scott McElreath
118W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Mark Combs
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Michael Marchi
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alan Crews
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Greg Cooper
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.