Teams

The Forest - McDonald

2026 LeeCharlotte Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 M

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Cremer / Eric Hynden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-16vs SpringWinner/UTC-UgdurLost 02
L#1 DoublesGordon Cassie / Andrew Musarra vs Juan Colon / Marcus Soori1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDechen Albero / Roger Solis vs Luke Mancuso / Jorge Perez3-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs SpringWinner/UTC-UgdurLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenrick Gallander / Eric Hynden vs Humberto Rodriguez / Juan Colon2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Musarra / Roger Solis vs Houtan Sareh / Marcus Soori2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGordon Cassie / Steve McDonald vs Thomas Legg / Luke Mancuso3-6, 2-6
2026-05-07vs SpringWinner/UTC-UgdurLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Cremer / Kenrick Gallander vs Juan Colon / Humberto Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGordon Cassie / Roger Solis vs Marcus Soori / Orlando Fernandez3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAndrew Musarra / Steve McDonald vs Luke Mancuso / Jorge Perez1-6, 1-6
2026-04-29vs SpringWinner/UTC-UgdurLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenrick Gallander / Roger Solis vs Humberto Rodriguez / Juan Colon2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGordon Cassie / Brian Oldenburg vs Luke Mancuso / Thomas Legg0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAndrew Musarra / Dechen Albero vs Carmelo Rubio / Jorge Perez2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SpringWinner/UTC-Ugdur7118614163
2Hancock Park - Zaliauskas35111328199
3The Forest - McDonald2671735231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kenrick Gallander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Oldenburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Andrew Musarra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Dechen Albero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eric Hynden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gordon Cassie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Cremer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Solis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steve McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Rizzo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenrick Gallander
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Brian Oldenburg
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Musarra
2W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Dechen Albero
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Eric Hynden
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gordon Cassie
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Cremer
61W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Roger Solis
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve McDonald
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Rizzo
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.