Teams

DBrantmeyer (Park Road)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Jon Koceja
published
3.96
Rob Conkie
published
3.87
Hector Tovar
published
3.85
William Merlo
published
Brent Grayson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
John England
published
3.54
Tim Chu
published
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
published
Jon Nee
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Koceja
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Rob Conkie
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
Hector Tovar
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
William Merlo
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Brent Grayson
58W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John England
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Tim Chu
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Nee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.