Teams

SDeVries (PCC)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-03vs KGibson (Raintree)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAllison Geoghegan vs Kirstin Martin4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Pavlovich vs Summer Nunn4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesDiana Bozzuto vs Jennifer Tucker4-6, 1-6
2025-07-15vs EAnderson (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKristin Salina vs Emilia Anderson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSara DeVries vs Emma SEGAL0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLaurie Eatman vs RACHEL Patterson1-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs BBuckner/HForeman (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Suppa vs Hailey Foreman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAllison Geoghegan vs Beth Buckner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMelissa Pavlovich vs Lindsey Vliet6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs MGross (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Salina vs Raegan Wright6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSara DeVries vs Zahide Marenic4-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs JMugnano (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Suppa vs Emily Pansa6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKayla Rodriguez vs Georgia Cook6-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDiana Bozzuto vs Kelsey Davis7-5, 6-4
2025-06-10vs MABullock (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSara DeVries vs Chelsea Law2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLaurie Eatman vs Christian Bohnstedt6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-28vs ASu (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesLaurie Eatman vs Xia Xia4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Sara DeVries
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Elizabeth Suppa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Trina Blankenship
published
2.47
Laurie Eatman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.42
Kristin Salina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Melissa Pavlovich
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.31
Allison Geoghegan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Diana Bozzuto
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Kayla Rodriguez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sara DeVries
30W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Elizabeth Suppa
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Trina Blankenship
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.65
2.5
Laurie Eatman
19W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.47
2.5
Kristin Salina
25W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Melissa Pavlovich
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Allison Geoghegan
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Diana Bozzuto
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Rodriguez
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.