Teams

IND-The Dalles

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-13vs CBRC-McAteerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAdam Rahmlow / Jessi O'Brien vs Dagney Markle / Jesus Bravo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kelly / Michelle Anslinger vs Sheng-Lun Tai / Sondra Edwards2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPaul Henry / Mikayla Kelly vs Darin Edwards / Stephanie Flowers2-6, 5-7
2024-10-13vs IND-BoughtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessi O'Brien / Paul Henry vs Ming Li / Jolene Boughton6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kelly / Mikayla Kelly vs Scott Dowson / Stacey Neal2-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs YTC-Smart AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Kelly / Michelle Anslinger vs Kristin Larson / Scott Stephen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Kelly / Paul Henry vs David Sarbacher / Stacy Stephen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Rahmlow / Kristen Booth vs Dawn Degrasse / Timothy Miller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-12vs EW-PC-GavinoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Booth / Adam Rahmlow vs Alisha Nguyen / Kenny Saari0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Kelly / Paul Henry vs Michael Khounnala / Lisa Smith2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMikayla Kelly / Michael Kelly vs Maria Uy / Ryan Lucas Gavino3-6, 1-6
2024-10-11vs YTC-BeyerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Kelly / Paul Henry vs Zori Fossum / Jeff Brantner1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Booth / Adam Rahmlow vs Megan Beyer / David Garent4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Kelly / Michelle Anslinger vs Heather Rinden / Timothy Rinden7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Gavino50132589
2YTC-Smart Aces419613126
3YTC-Beyer329615140
4CBRC-McAteer146920159
5IND-Boughton1451020153
6IND-The Dalles1431225166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Adam Rahmlow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jessi O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Booth
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Anslinger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mikayla Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Booth + Adam Rahmlow2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Kelly
13W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Adam Rahmlow
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessi O'Brien
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Booth
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Anslinger
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikayla Kelly
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.