Teams

KLaan-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

12 players · average NTRP 3.65 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 8:00 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 17 8:00 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Sep 24 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
2026-08-27vs LKulp.7.5C-SVCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKristi Laan / Alyse Levine vs Christine Sudzina Schut / Sallie Nowacek6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Chiles / Kathryn Kabat vs Melissa Coward / Anne Stephens6-3, 6-2
2026-08-20vs MLong.7.5C-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarli Eller / Mary Jo Dunnington vs Ulrike Foley / Aine Lynch6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Chan / Miho Ogura vs Celina Morice / Kelsie Cappetta6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrenda Li / Lauren Triebert vs RANEE KUMAR / Hannah Blackburn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Megan Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Elizabeth Chan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Karli Eller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Miho Ogura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Heidi Lanford
published 4
3.38
Kristi Laan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Alyse Levine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Lauren Triebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kathryn Kabat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Laan + Mary Jo Dunnington9460% games+6.0% vs expected
Karli Eller + Mary Jo Dunnington21761% games+5.7% vs expected
Kristi Laan + Miho Ogura5556% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Laan + Karli Eller4351% gamesnot enough data
Karli Eller + Cathy Joyce4255% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Lanford + Alyse Levine224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Chan + Miho Ogura314 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Lanford + Mary Jo Dunnington033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
123W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Megan Chiles
154W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Elizabeth Chan
34W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
255W–118L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Karli Eller
162W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Brenda Li
276W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Miho Ogura
277W–247L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
4
Heidi Lanford
31W–48L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–181L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Alyse Levine
31W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Lauren Triebert
167W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathryn Kabat
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.