Teams

WIKIUP R SC 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jamin Ruark
published 4
3.93
Jady Palko
published 4
3.85
Brad Swadling
published 4
3.77
Margaret Murray
published
3.73
Philippe Hobson
published
3.66
Selvan Ekambaram
published
3.52
Renz Hoppe
published
3.46
Craig Lucas
published 3.5
3.41
Nadia Mansfield
published
3.36
Paulette Bensussen
published
3.35
Shannon Hausman
published
3.34
Francisco Nogueira
published 3.5
3.33
Jessica Wilhelm
published
3.27
Courtney Cochran
published 3.5
3.27
Tom Cargile
published
3.26
ERIC SOTHERN
published 3.5
3.26
Ginger Kelly
published 3.5
3.25
Tom Andrews
published
3.25
Abdel Aziz Zhari
published 3.5
3.22
Kellie Larson
published
3.12
Michelle Swadling
published
3.12
Hilary Opel
published 3
2.88
Lisa McIntyre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Swadling + Michelle Swadling5353% games−7.3% vs expected
Ginger Kelly + Renz Hoppe224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Hausman + Selvan Ekambaram224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamin Ruark
21W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Jady Palko
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Brad Swadling
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
Margaret Murray
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Philippe Hobson
27W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.73
Selvan Ekambaram
25W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
Renz Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Craig Lucas
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Nadia Mansfield
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Paulette Bensussen
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Shannon Hausman
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Francisco Nogueira
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Jessica Wilhelm
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Courtney Cochran
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Tom Cargile
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
ERIC SOTHERN
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ginger Kelly
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Tom Andrews
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Abdel Aziz Zhari
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Kellie Larson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Michelle Swadling
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.12
3
Hilary Opel
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
Lisa McIntyre
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.