Teams

Bake - Volley Girls

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.0 - Bake

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-02vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusLost 01
L#1 SinglesLuann Shults vs Jasmin Batiste0-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarcy Polley / Jessica Smith vs ALEXANDRA MENDOZA / Cindy Douglass5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrenda Kettler vs Grace Lyn Pangaldan3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Friesen / Eloise Walker vs SUZANNE TEVELDE / Rhea Barrett7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Wisham / Andrea Woroch vs Jasmin Batiste / Agnes Hadraki0-6, 0-6
2025-02-16vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Kettler / Luann Shults vs Jasmin Batiste / Trellis Green6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachel Friesen / Luann Shults vs Tanya Mussatto / Kristine Tran Lau6-3, 6-0
2025-01-19vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusWon 10
W#2 DoublesLuann Shults / Eloise Walker vs Grace Lyn Pangaldan / Tanya Mussatto6-3, 6-3
2025-01-12vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrenda Kettler / Stacy DeVries vs Trellis Green / Chelsea Ashcraft6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMia Lagunda vs Kari Underwood6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Friesen / Eloise Walker vs Sheryl Idica Ocampo / ALEXANDRA MENDOZA6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesShannon Boren / Marcy Polley vs Grace Lyn Pangaldan / Tanya Mussatto4-6, 3-6
2025-01-05vs Bake-LLW-Tennis Collective PlusWon 10
W#1 SinglesLuann Shults vs Chelsea Ashcraft6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Melissa Fackler
published
2.92
Tracey Barnes
published
2.88
Luann Shults
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Stacy DeVries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Marcy Polley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Eloise Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Mia Lagunda
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Brenda Kettler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.74
Rachel Friesen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Shannon Boren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Ann Wisham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Andrea Woroch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Nancy Lerma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Barnes + Luann Shults6161% games+7.3% vs expected
Rachel Friesen + Eloise Walker2448% games−1.9% vs expected
Rachel Friesen + Marcy Polley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Fackler
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Tracey Barnes
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Luann Shults
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Stacy DeVries
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Marcy Polley
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Eloise Walker
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Mia Lagunda
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brenda Kettler
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Rachel Friesen
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Shannon Boren
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Ann Wisham
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Andrea Woroch
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Nancy Lerma
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.