Teams

Cox-Lovelace/META

2025 Combo 18 & over-META · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Janiszewsk/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesJu Mo / Ruth Jackson vs Sarah LaGuardia / Eve Little Bradford7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJean Swindle / Kim Cartier vs Anita Jilton / Morgan Scott1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Wells / Madga Cox vs Lynne Little / Regan Jordan6-7, 1-6
2025-09-15vs Janiszewsk/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadga Cox / Olivia Osborne vs Lynne Little / Regan Jordan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJu Mo / Ruth Jackson vs Anneke Self / Eve Little Bradford6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Rachel Lovelace vs Barb Janiszewski / Anita Jilton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-13vs Janiszewsk/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesRuth Jackson / Rachel Lovelace vs Brittini Thacker / Lynne Little4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJean Swindle / Madga Cox vs Anita Jilton / Sarah LaGuardia4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Wells / Christina Betancourt vs Regan Jordan / Anneke Self0-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs Janiszewsk/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesJu Mo / Mary Warner vs Sarah LaGuardia / Eve Little Bradford4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Lovelace / Madga Cox vs Raegan Goodson / Regan Jordan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKim Cartier / Jessica Alzamora vs Brittini Thacker / Anneke Self0-6, 0-6
2025-08-30vs Janiszewsk/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesMadga Cox / Olivia Osborne vs Brittini Thacker / Lynne Little3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Warner / Margaret Wells vs Anita Jilton / Morgan Scott2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Jackson / Christina Betancourt vs Barb Janiszewski / Bettina Chirica4-6, 4-6
2025-08-25vs Janiszewsk/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Reeves / Ju Mo vs Anita Jilton / Holly Grammer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Lovelace / Ruth Jackson vs Bettina Chirica / Raegan Goodson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJean Swindle / Kim Cartier vs Lynne Little / Anneke Self1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Janiszewsk/META5113513128
2Cox-Lovelace/META1551329194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ju Mo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Madga Cox
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Christina Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Jean Swindle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Margaret Wells
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Jessica Alzamora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Cartier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Lovelace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ruth Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Wells + Madga Cox224 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Osborne + Madga Cox314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ju Mo
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
Madga Cox
26W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Jean Swindle
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
Margaret Wells
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kim Cartier
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Reeves
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Osborne
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Lovelace
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Jackson
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.