Teams

BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-Horii

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs BC-WestEnd/DianeKaiserWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Nook / Randi Young vs Suzanne Dunn / Aileen Kizlinski6-2, 6-3
2023-05-27vs BC-ErnieHowlett/TracyCostantinoLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Karen Kredel vs Margaret Gray / Tami Reyes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEiko Bacich / Randi Young vs Angelica Galvez-Deutsch / MINA RICABAR1-6, 0-6
2023-05-07vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kredel / Stephanie Guggenheim vs Lauren Bruksch / Sejal Penkar6-4, 6-4
2023-04-23vs BC-ElDorado/JoGarrettWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kredel / Stephanie Guggenheim vs Emalyn Anthony / Josephine Garrett6-1, 6-3
2023-04-16vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowLost 01
L#1 DoublesVenita McLay / Randi Young vs Karin Chafetz / Keiko Marumoto2-6, 0-6
2023-04-01vs SoCal/Odanaka/18&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Karen Kredel vs Evelyn Yanke / Kayla Yanke4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Elizabeth Shelor
published 4
3.87
3.84
3.68
Karen Kredel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Venita McLay
published
3.49
Michelle Rosen
published
3.42
Teena Wapner
published
3.37
Jane Mehra
published
3.16
Janet Young
published
Jacqueline Geiger
published
Leslie Muzzio
published
Nikki Nance
published
Randi Young
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Kredel + Stephanie Guggenheim13751% games+7.6% vs expected
Jane Mehra + Teena Wapner4260% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Shelor
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Stephanie Guggenheim
67W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Galena Miller-Horii
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Karen Kredel
42W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Venita McLay
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.50
Michelle Rosen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Teena Wapner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jane Mehra
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Janet Young
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jacqueline Geiger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Muzzio
53W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Randi Young
46W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.