Teams

OC NBTC - Donna

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-11vs OC Laguna Niguel RC - PamWon 21
W#1 DoublesFelicia Miller / Kathy White vs Morgan Nusz / Courtney Zani4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiriam Morales / Jodie McCollum vs Gina Christian / Alisa Gentry7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelena Linton-Eriksson / Nedra Jenkins vs Mona Karram / Sueann Jones2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Felicia Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Miriam Morales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Diane Heimstaedt
published 4
3.74
Rikki Scharnell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Diane Rettew
published 4
3.69
Leanne Sheward
published
3.67
Terri Hamm
published
3.65
Anne Marie Block
published 4
3.61
Lea Tamblyn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Karen Comstock
published
3.50
Jeannine Sandling
published
3.41
Tara Tung
published
3.41
Donna Cox
published
3.36
Helena Linton-Eriksson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Nedra Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Frost
published
Gina Cereda
published
Jodie McCollum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Heck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea Tamblyn + Rikki Scharnell121648% games−8.8% vs expected
Leanne Sheward + Anne Marie Block224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Felicia Miller
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
Miriam Morales
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Diane Heimstaedt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Rikki Scharnell
101W–99L career · 14 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Diane Rettew
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Leanne Sheward
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Terri Hamm
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Anne Marie Block
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Lea Tamblyn
45W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
Karen Comstock
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jeannine Sandling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Tara Tung
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Donna Cox
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
Helena Linton-Eriksson
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
Nedra Jenkins
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.28
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gina Cereda
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jodie McCollum
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Maria Heck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.