Teams

Love Means Nothing

2026 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-21vs Wailea Hot ShotsWon 50
W#1 DoublesMona Decrinis / Jill Kanahele vs Gena Castorena / Liezl Lao6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAiko da Silva vs Elina Hartkopf6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery vs Anne Riley / Pamela Henry6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeborah Sawyer / Cynthia Feike vs M Beverly Rivers / Janet Deandre6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesYuki Carrozzino / Maylynn Ikioka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-14vs MCC Team No LimitsLost 23
L#1 DoublesRita Ingstad / Leslie Haughney vs Catherine Hall / Brooke von Tempsky6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMona Decrinis vs Carolyn Flam Sharp3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAiko da Silva / Ruby Matsui vs Kimber Hoang-Street / Karen Sullivan3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJill Kanahele / Deanna DiBiase vs Tesha Newman / Jeanne Dunn6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesPetra Dupont / Ligaya Acob-Powell vs Rebecca Jakeway / Tana Leander6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-31vs 40-LoveWon 32
L#1 DoublesRita Ingstad / Deborah Sawyer vs Nalani Cagasan / Marisa Fujimoto1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCynthia Funai vs Eveline Wunder2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele vs Gage Beerer / Kandy Grantz6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Kristine Oyama / Josephine Moyes6-0, 6-2
W#4 DoublesFa'Aiuga Ratterman / Maylynn Ikioka vs Kelly Thayer / Lori Tanaka6-3, 6-4
2026-01-25vs CocktalesWon 41
L#1 DoublesYuki Carrozzino / Cynthia Funai vs Marisa Fujimoto / Nalani Cagasan3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAiko da Silva vs Sonnie Koko6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele vs Gwen Yoshimoto / Lori Tanaka6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCynthia Feike / Mona Decrinis vs Juliana Massenburg / Kandy Grantz1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#4 DoublesPetra Dupont / Rita Ingstad vs Josephine Moyes / Kristine Oyama6-2, 7-6
2026-01-18vs Wailea Hot ShotsWon 50
W#1 DoublesPetra Dupont / Ligaya Acob-Powell vs Andrea Karal / Liezl Lao6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery vs Heidi Lowe / Elina Hartkopf6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFa'Aiuga Ratterman / Leslie Haughney vs Gena Castorena / Leslie Wilshusen6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesNani Ehlinger / Rita Ingstad vs Janet Deandre / Alice Koniges6-0, 6-1
2026-01-17vs MCC Team No LimitsWon 32
L#1 DoublesNani Ehlinger / Jill Kanahele vs Tana Leander / Karen Sullivan2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTracy Halbersleben vs Rebecca Jakeway6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Aiko da Silva vs Judy Close / Carolyn Flam Sharp6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Maylynn Ikioka vs Jeanne Dunn / Kelly Cannon6-7, 4-6
W#4 DoublesRita Ingstad / Leslie Haughney vs Daisy Finch / Tesha Newman6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Ruby Matsui
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.04
Petra Dupont
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Tracy Halbersleben
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.94
Aiko da Silva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.90
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Cynthia Feike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Rita Ingstad
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Mona Decrinis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Leslie Haughney
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Deborah Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Funai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Nani Ehlinger
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ligaya Acob-Powell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Yuki Carrozzino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Ingstad + Debbie Montgomery7457% games+18.4% vs expected
Aiko da Silva + Yuki Carrozzino12166% games+10.3% vs expected
Jill Kanahele + Deanna DiBiase231259% games+8.0% vs expected
Deanna DiBiase + Nani Ehlinger6061% games+7.1% vs expected
Cynthia Feike + Ruby Matsui17759% games+4.5% vs expected
Cynthia Funai + Deanna DiBiase7452% games+4.4% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Cynthia Feike2344% games+4.0% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Petra Dupont9162% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruby Matsui
55W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.04
4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Tracy Halbersleben
48W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Aiko da Silva
118W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Cynthia Feike
88W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Rita Ingstad
63W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Mona Decrinis
103W–125L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Deborah Sawyer
39W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cynthia Funai
93W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Nani Ehlinger
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
36W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Ligaya Acob-Powell
58W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yuki Carrozzino
39W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.