Teams

CFranc (Piper Glen )

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-26vs MZiewacz (Olde Providence)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnna Hitchins / David Shevsky vs Sarah Niess / Matthew Niess6-3, 6-3
2022-07-05vs MAhern (Palisades)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Franc / Anna Hitchins vs Mike Boston / Meaghan Ahern2-6, 1-6
2022-06-21vs LKing (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Shevsky / Amy Langdon vs Dion Chever / Elly Tennyson6-3, 6-3
2022-06-14vs WParker/OPunjabi (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAnthony Bertucci / Amy Langdon vs Justin Wycoff / Diane Bach1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Franc / Anna Hitchins vs Adam Yabes / Julian Black4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-07vs MZiewacz (Olde Providence)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Langdon / Thad Walton vs Ashley Rudolph / Mark Rudolph2-6, 4-6
2022-05-31vs MShea (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Chris Franc vs Chandrasekar Swaminathan / Laurie Canata6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesThad Walton / Amy Langdon vs Katy Hart / Kirk Olsen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Hitchins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
David Buffie
published 4.5
4.18
Amy Guear
published 4.5
4.11
Mary Beth Huffman
published
3.83
Henry Harborne
published 4
3.83
Chris Franc
published 4
3.81
Amy Langdon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
David Shevsky
published 3.5
3.39
Anthony Bertucci
published 3.5
3.37
Katy Walters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hitchins + Chris Franc213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
David Buffie
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Amy Guear
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Mary Beth Huffman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Henry Harborne
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Chris Franc
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Amy Langdon
52W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
3.5
David Shevsky
118W–37L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.65
4
Lauren Pruett Strickler
46W–43L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Anthony Bertucci
53W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lauren Taylor Grames
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Katy Walters
22W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.