Teams

VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-28vs DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGayle Hoy / Susan Brightwell vs Tina Christensen / Catherine Mclester1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMary McGarvey / Lynsey Weber vs Lisa Beebe / Tammy Langdon6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCourtney Mcmenamin / Karen Holbrook vs Maureen Hussey / Andrea Kummer2-6, 4-6
2026-08-21vs LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGayle Hoy / Courtney Mcmenamin vs Laura Pratt / Latha Baddigam0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah Garagiola / Susan Brightwell vs Reshma Vora / Jennifer McNally1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTracey VanCott / Sara Cannon vs Melissa Eccleston / Sun Moon0-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs SNewman (BCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLynsey Weber / Ashle Basden vs Kathleen Stepp / Sheri Newman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSara Cannon / Rebecca Lothe vs Jigisha Thaker / Melodie Ohaus0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Mcmenamin / Virginia Borkey vs Carlene Delorenzo / Kristin Webster3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-14vs VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLynsey Weber / Rebecca Lothe vs Melissa Warren / Erin Overcash3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary McGarvey / Karen Holbrook vs Maureen Paterson / Natalie Costello2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Porter / Jessica Hargis vs Volree Wade / Heather Hagar0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Dana Holloman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Ashle Basden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Courtney Mcmenamin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Susan Brightwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.88
Rebecca Lothe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Mary McGarvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Lynsey Weber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Gayle Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.51
Karen Holbrook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Virginia Borkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.09
Jessica Hargis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Lynn Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebekah Garagiola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey VanCott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary McGarvey + Lynsey Weber2348% gamesnot enough data
Karen Holbrook + Gayle Hoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Holloman
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Courtney Mcmenamin
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Susan Brightwell
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Rebecca Lothe
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Mary McGarvey
73W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Lynsey Weber
22W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Gayle Hoy
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Karen Holbrook
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Virginia Borkey
23W–56L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Jessica Hargis
11W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Lynn Porter
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rebekah Garagiola
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tracey VanCott
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.