Teams

STANFORD-CRA 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Tracy Roeder
published
3.89
Michele Brown
published
3.86
Emily Ling
published
3.86
Kristin Ostby
published
3.83
Sofia Yoshimoto
published
3.78
Barbara Klausner
published 4
3.75
Chenchen Zhang
published 4
Denise Monack
published 4
3.75
Lynn Mickleburgh
published
3.70
Stephannie Lobell
published
3.25
Jen Cheung
published
3.13
Shannon Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Julie Wilcox
published
Pamela Ison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sofia Yoshimoto + Michele Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Sofia Yoshimoto + Kristin Ostby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Roeder
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.90
Michele Brown
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Emily Ling
42W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Kristin Ostby
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Sofia Yoshimoto
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Barbara Klausner
8W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Chenchen Zhang
26W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Denise Monack
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Mickleburgh
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Stephannie Lobell
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Jen Cheung
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Shannon Wolfe
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Julie Wilcox
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Pamela Ison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.