Teams

6-SBaldwin-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-04-28vs 4-SHarvey-DFCLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Baldwin / Pamela Hankerson vs Amanda Lacoff / Tiffany Hilton1-6, 1-6
2022-04-26vs 5-OGorbacheva-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Roberta Hadley vs Christina Aldereguia / Jenna Schreiber7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Oxana Gorbacheva1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Emily Childs / Janel Green6-2, 6-2
2022-04-21vs 4-SHarvey-DFCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoberta Hadley / Lynise Devance vs Lacey Chylack / Barbara Gillespie6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAshley McRae / Pamela Hankerson vs Amanda Lacoff / Suyeon Kim2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-21vs 2-JRoss-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Betsy Shane vs Heidi Ross / Lynsey Easley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Hankerson / Ashley McRae vs Lisa Buyaki / Meghan Howard3-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs 7-SLantry-EnoWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Betsy Shane vs Anneliese Carr / Michelle Then6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Nicole Bullock / Emily Culbreth6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wray / Ashley McRae vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-12vs 3-LBolger-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Jennifer Wray vs Nannette Goodwin / Meghan Zerkel2-6, 3-6
2022-04-07vs 1-ELinnander-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoberta Hadley / Erin McAllister vs Amy Drew / Christine Sudzina Schut6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesZana Piric / Melissa Everitt vs Erika Linnander / Katie Pryal3-6, 2-6
2022-03-30vs 7-SLantry-EnoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Betsy Shane vs Amelia Blankenship / Michelle Then2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPamela Hankerson vs Carrie Guthrie0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Jessica Sherman / Mallory Short6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRoberta Hadley / Kathryn Pollak vs Christina Jenkins / Rebekah Schloemann6-0, 6-3
2022-03-24vs 5-OGorbacheva-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Betsy Shane vs Judith Stewart / Emily Childs6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Pollak / Roberta Hadley vs Elizabeth Harvie / Alison Doherty6-2, 6-3
2022-03-22vs 2-JRoss-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Jennifer Wray vs Justyne Ross / Heidi Ross6-1, 6-1
2022-03-17vs 3-LBolger-EnoLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Bailey / Pamela Hankerson vs Kristen Fuller / Rosa Lopez Sanchez0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley McRae / Jennifer Wray vs Jane Williams / Kimberly Patrey1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZana Piric / Cheryl Stewart vs Amber Cagle / Meryl Golder3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-01vs 1-ELinnander-EnoLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Erika Linnander / Sallie Nowacek1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynise Devance / Pamela Hankerson vs Amy Drew / Christine Sudzina Schut3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAshley McRae / Jennifer Wray vs Allison Stewart-Smull / Katie Naftel7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin McAllister
published 4
3.78
Lynise Devance
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.52
Betsy Shane
published 4
3.48
Ashley McRae
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Kathryn Pollak
published
3.38
Roberta Hadley
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.31
Zana Piric
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Courtney Bailey
published 3.5
3.08
Pamela Hankerson
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Nichole Hatcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Hadley + Pamela Hankerson121647% games+3.3% vs expected
Pamela Hankerson + Ashley McRae91051% games−0.2% vs expected
Roberta Hadley + Lynise Devance6074% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin McAllister
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Lynise Devance
126W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Betsy Shane
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ashley McRae
164W–155L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
Kathryn Pollak
4W–20L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Roberta Hadley
246W–120L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Courtney Bailey
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Pamela Hankerson
96W–202L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Nichole Hatcher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.