Teams

Arbor Greene - C. VanMeter

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesDenys Hubbard / Alessandra Giraldo vs Claudia George / Katherine Grichnik4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Hart / Rebecca Gaier vs Debbie Hirth / Monica Castaneda7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sharpless / Rebecca Gaier vs Asha Grover / Neha Bishnoi6-1, 6-3
2023-08-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGeri Burke / Rebecca Gaier vs Lisa Bitting / Nikki Spirakis2-6, 4-6
2023-08-10vs Hills/M. Barry/18&Over5.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Courtney Craig vs Sue Maxwell / Karen Sanford2-6, 5-7
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLesley Brewis / Rebecca Gaier vs Deb Spears / Becky Meidt7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesGeri Burke / Rebecca Gaier vs Renee DiVincent / Jeanne Ann Killam6-3, 6-0
2023-07-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaMonica Lovett / Rebecca Gaier vs Sandra Grimes / Sylvie Derksen6-2, 6-3
2023-07-27vs Westchase - T. AshourLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Jennifer Sharpless vs Jennifer Miller / Trina Ashour2-6, 3-6
2023-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Courtney Craig vs Denise Stone / Kristi Schorr6-0, 6-1
2023-06-29vs Hills/M. Barry/18&Over5.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenys Hubbard / Courtney Craig vs Audrey Kessler / Sue Maxwell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Jennifer Sharpless vs Evelyn Delelys / Megan Corn7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Rebecca Gaier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.85
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.71
Denys Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Heather Allred
published
2.62
Amy Butts
published 3
2.57
2.43
Colette O'Connor
published 3
2.39
Jennifer Sharpless
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denys Hubbard + Rebecca Gaier11554% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 10 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Denys Hubbard
125W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Heather Allred
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Christine Sullivan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Colette O'Connor
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.43
Jennifer Sharpless
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.