Teams

Team 10 Haven Aces

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-07vs Team 1 The AvengersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Siegfried / Caroline Kahl vs Lemin Xiao / Xin Guan5-7, 5-4
2025-05-15vs Team 15 TennisityLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Lisa Russo MacK vs Lei Wang / Andrea Spira1-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Siegfried / Cornelia Turyn vs Amy Heuer / Lynnita Montague-Daddio7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Team 11 Spin DoctorsWon 10
W#1 SinglesTerry Siegfried vs Mimi Vu6-2, 5-2
2025-04-06vs Team 9 Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Kahl / Laura Riesenberg vs Niki Friedman / Anne McDonald0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison Weiss
published 3.5
3.23
Katharine Kastens
published
3.00
Cornelia Turyn
published 3
2.95
Gretchen Hobbs
published
2.91
KATIE MEERSTEIN
published
2.90
Stephanie Dolan
published
2.79
Terry Siegfried
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Jennifer Lucas
published
2.69
Caroline Kahl
published 3
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Karina Agudelo
published
2.57
2.57
Mary Lewis
published
2.55
Ashley Adams
published 3
2.51
Rebecca Sandler
published
Carrie Libell
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Adams + KATIE MEERSTEIN2341% games−10.4% vs expected
Karina Agudelo + Caroline Kahl033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Weiss
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katharine Kastens
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3
Cornelia Turyn
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Gretchen Hobbs
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
KATIE MEERSTEIN
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Stephanie Dolan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Terry Siegfried
33W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Jennifer Lucas
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Caroline Kahl
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Laura Riesenberg
87W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Karina Agudelo
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Christine Friedberg
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Mary Lewis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Ashley Adams
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Rebecca Sandler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Carrie Libell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.