Teams

Caribbean/Reck/55&Over6.0M

Adult 55 & Over 2023 · Adult 55 & Over M6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJuan Guzman / ROBERTO Fernandez vs Heribrto Martinez / Eduardo Zuniga7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesReinaldo Aponte Betancourt / ROBERTO Fernandez vs William Ramos / Carlos Rodriguez Garcia6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesGerardo Lago / ROBERTO Fernandez vs Jose Rivera-Colon / Josean Kareh2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesReinaldo Aponte Betancourt / Ramon Velez vs Carlos Rivera / Rafael Rivera4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesReinaldo Aponte Betancourt / Claudio Reck vs Carlos Rivera / Rafael Rivera1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesGerardo Lago / ROBERTO Fernandez vs Rafael Rivera / Walter Lopez6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesReinaldo Aponte Betancourt / David Vega vs Carlos Rivera / William Ramos7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over M6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Francisco Colon-Fontanez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jose Ortiz
published
2.87
ROBERTO Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
2.83
Gerardo Lago
published 3
David Vega
published 3
2.48
Claudio Reck
published 3
Ramon Velez
published
Reinaldo Aponte Betancourt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reinaldo Aponte Betancourt + ROBERTO Fernandez6453% games+9.5% vs expected
Claudio Reck + Francisco Graciano2351% gamesnot enough data
ROBERTO Fernandez + Francisco Graciano404 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Graciano + Francisco Colon-Fontanez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Francisco Colon-Fontanez
66W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
Jose Ortiz
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
ROBERTO Fernandez
60W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Francisco Graciano
38W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Gerardo Lago
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
David Vega
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Claudio Reck
13W–32L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Ramon Velez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reinaldo Aponte Betancourt
43W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.