Teams

Cottano/ 18/ 5.5/ CWN/ BREC

2026 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Bocage Racquet Club
Oct 7 8:00 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
2026-09-09vs Dallalio/18/5.5/CWN/LegLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrena Zajickova / Rachael Blake vs Dana Meadors / Kali Duncan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCameron Cottano / Amy Maggio vs Tamara Palmer / Ashley Quartararo5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWyndi Guillory / Shannon Ellis vs Amy Comeaux / Faren Wise6-2, 6-2
2026-09-02vs Blalock/18/5.5/CWN/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Bell / Irena Zajickova vs Britni Pritchard / Ashley Swinney3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMicah Luong / Rachael Blake vs Emily Guillory / Dawn Rabalais6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCameron Cottano / Amanda Ledet vs Michelle Lafleur / Jennifer Eiermann1-6, 6-7
2026-08-19vs Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesWyndi Guillory / Alejandra Rodriguez vs Taylor Nauck / Montana Chandler2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Bell / Gina Jory vs Amy Boudreaux / Katie Boudreaux0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMicah Luong / Rachael Blake vs Johanna Fabian / Emily Ward6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Rodriguez/18/5.5/CWN/UCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Bell / Irena Zajickova vs Kristina Rodriguez / Jenna Fritscher6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Petty / Wyndi Guillory vs Jessica Ledet / Katherine Landry6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Blake / Amanda Ledet vs Rachel Webre / Debbie Thomas7-6, 6-4
2026-08-05vs Earnheart/18/5.5/CWN/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Bell / Irena Zajickova vs Rena Jacomina Bickham / Katie Thorne6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Ellis / Wyndi Guillory vs Leigh Bonfanti / Lana Malone6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmanda Ledet / Cameron Cottano vs Peggy Blouin / Barbara Cerniauskas4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-29vs Derousselle/18/5.5/CWN/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesMicah Luong / Irena Zajickova vs Sherri Nguyen / Amy Patureau6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCameron Cottano / Gina Jory vs Adriana Ramirez / Rebecca Barham6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Ellis / Amy Maggio vs Alex Marasco / Christy Duncan6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BREC3090133
2Cottano/ 18/ 5.5/ CWN/ BREC3090239
3Pearson/18/5.5/CWN/Leg3081232
4Blalock/18/5.5/CWN/SOAC3072770
5Dallalio/18/5.5/CWN/Leg2154970
6Derousselle/18/5.5/CWN/BREC12451184
7Pittman/18/5.5/CWN/Boc031817104
8Earnheart/18/5.5/CWN/BREC031817105
9Richard/18/5.5/CWN/CCLA031817108
10Rodriguez/18/5.5/CWN/UC030918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Micah Luong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Laura Petty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Cameron Cottano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alejandra Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Rachael Blake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Wendy Williams
published
2.56
Kami Lambe
published
2.41
Irena Zajickova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Amanda Ledet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Wyndi Guillory
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gina Jory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Amy Maggio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Micah Luong + Rachael Blake5073% games+23.8% vs expected
Rachael Blake + Amanda Ledet213 matchesnot enough data
Wyndi Guillory + Amy Maggio123 matchesnot enough data
Kami Lambe + Amy Maggio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Micah Luong
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Laura Petty
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Cameron Cottano
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Alejandra Rodriguez
17W–13L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rachael Blake
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
Wendy Williams
34W–41L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kami Lambe
13W–35L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Irena Zajickova
12W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Amanda Ledet
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Wyndi Guillory
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Gina Jory
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amy Maggio
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.