Teams

Fee - Edwards

2026 Brevard Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-06vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Char Lindsay vs Becky Press / Gisela Alcalde6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Karen Cornthwaite vs Ligia Moss / Lori Abbott6-1, 6-2
2026-02-27vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarien Lawrence / Janis Mena vs Michelle Winterich / Iliana Bleau4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Karen Cornthwaite vs Mary Failla / Linda Carrillo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGena Wools / Char Lindsay vs Lori Abbott / Xu Sue Huang2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-20vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesGena Wools / Cynthia Simmons vs Gisela Alcalde / Iliana Bleau6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Karen Cornthwaite vs Kim Johnson / Lyuda Saks1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChar Lindsay / Janis Mena vs Linda Carrillo / Peggy Wilson4-6, 3-6
2026-02-13vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Cynthia Simmons vs Gisela Alcalde / Donna Urbanek4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Karen Cornthwaite vs Mary Failla / Tee Wells7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChar Lindsay / Janis Mena vs Ligia Moss / Melissa Dwyer6-3, 6-4
2026-02-06vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Karen Cornthwaite vs Gisela Alcalde / Iliana Bleau3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Michele Heyn vs Becky Press / Donna Urbanek2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Janis Mena vs Kim Johnson / Lyuda Saks1-6, 2-6
2026-01-30vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Karen Cornthwaite vs Donna Urbanek / Kim Johnson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Catherine Grainger vs Mary Failla / Michelle Winterich5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Susan Deschaine vs Lori Abbott / Tee Wells5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-23vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Karen Cornthwaite vs Gisela Alcalde / Michelle Winterich6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Cynthia Simmons vs Lyuda Saks / Peggy Wilson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDarien Lawrence / Kimberly Kressler vs Ligia Moss / Melissa Dwyer5-7, 4-6
2026-01-09vs Brevard/Huang/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Catherine Grainger vs Becky Press / Michelle Winterich1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChar Lindsay / Cynthia Simmons vs Kim Johnson / Tee Wells0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Gena Wools vs Linda Carrillo / Peggy Wilson6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Michele Heyn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Gena Wools
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Karen Cornthwaite
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Kressler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Wakefield
published
3.15
Darien Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Char Lindsay
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Janis Mena
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Susan Deschaine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Gena Wools1636% gamesnot enough data
Gena Wools + Karen Cornthwaite033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Gena Wools
29W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Karen Cornthwaite
3W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Kimberly Kressler
70W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Elizabeth Wakefield
37W–14L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Darien Lawrence
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Char Lindsay
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Janis Mena
72W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Susan Deschaine
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.