Teams

Oak Creek/Kendall-Wells W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-21vs Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesOmara Al-Hafi / Ami McCann vs Tami Jost / Becky Henson6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMilensky Rega vs Heidi Young6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Akin / Lilian Bowari vs Leah Collins / Dede Vehslage5-7, 4-6
2025-02-26vs Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesOmara Al-Hafi / Ami McCann vs Ashley Jeter / Kathy Adams6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTiffany Kendall vs Laurie Korinek2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Akin / Rikki Wells vs Cameron Allison / Kelsey Coady6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kaley Medina
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Rikki Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Omara Al-Hafi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Milensky Rega
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Lacy Frenzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Cindy Chiou
published 3.5
3.10
Tiffany Kendall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Jennifer Akin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Ami McCann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Lilian Bowari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Milensky Rega + Rikki Wells4260% games+15.1% vs expected
Kaley Medina + Lacy Frenzel4156% games+13.6% vs expected
Ami McCann + Omara Al-Hafi3641% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaley Medina
39W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
Rikki Wells
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Omara Al-Hafi
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Milensky Rega
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lacy Frenzel
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cindy Chiou
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Tiffany Kendall
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Akin
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ami McCann
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lilian Bowari
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.