Teams

Skears

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over Women 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Cynthia Wofford
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Rosemary Harty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Kay Kalber
published
2.39
Cathy Hoffman
published 2.5
2.37
Sandra Julian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jessica Gibson
published
Patrice Holtz
published
Sophia Crawley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Wofford
180W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Rosemary Harty
68W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Cathy Hoffman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2021
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Sandra Julian
34W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%84%16%
2.37
Jessica Gibson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrice Holtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.