Teams

Lewis/Knoxville

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-02vs Parks/KnoxvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesGloria Palacios / Rose Perkinson vs Jen Stallings / Carolina Lyngh0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMeka Barry vs Kristen Overbay6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLora Boruff / Karen Bell vs Jenny Hall / Katherine Michalik2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLake Bailey / Maggie Reynolds vs Ashley Hoskins / Julie Kizer6-2, 6-0
W#4 DoublesMitzi Bodie / Michelle Corley vs Meg Brown / Rebecca Cantrell6-1, 6-1
2025-04-14vs Adams/KnoxvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesMeka Barry / Joanne Latimer vs Stacy McIntosh / Elsa Roland6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Corley vs Irene Shivers6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLora Boruff / Karen Bell vs Sue Mather / Brooke Wilson6-3, 7-5
W#4 DoublesGloria Palacios / Rose Perkinson vs Ann Wegner / Nicole Haas6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Penn-Smith/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesMeka Barry / Michelle Corley vs Julia Connor / Katie Buehler2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLake Bailey vs Sherry Byington6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJoanne Latimer / Rose Perkinson vs Amber McGhee / Heather Wilson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGloria Palacios / Karen Bell vs Shelly Krummen / Laila Yoder0-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesPomy Lewis / Maggie Reynolds vs Shannon Thackston / Rachel Waddell7-5, 7-5
2025-04-02vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesPomy Lewis / Michelle Corley vs Carolina Lyngh / Katherine Michalik5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMitzi Bodie vs Ashley Hoskins6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLake Bailey / Maggie Reynolds vs Alyssa Sprouse / Whitney Callahan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Bell / Lora Boruff vs Jen Stallings / Lea Parks3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#4 DoublesGloria Palacios / Rose Perkinson vs Janet Morgan / Rebecca Cantrell4-6, 3-6
2025-03-24vs Adams/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesPomy Lewis / Maggie Reynolds vs Michelle Sills / Joy Ruble6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLake Bailey vs Irene Shivers6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Corley / Lora Boruff vs Stacy McIntosh / Leigh M Krieps1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Marie Rasmussen / Gloria Palacios vs Brooke Wilson / Susan Payne5-7, 4-6
W#4 DoublesKaren Bell / Mitzi Bodie vs Elsa Roland / Laura Miller7-6, 7-6
2025-03-10vs Penn-Smith/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesMaggie Reynolds / Linda Judge-McRae vs Amber McGhee / Lynsey Anderson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPomy Lewis vs Sherry Byington6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Bell / Lora Boruff vs Keri Root / Laila Yoder2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoanne Latimer / Anne Marie Rasmussen vs Lisa Smith / Karen Watson2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesGloria Palacios / Suzanne Christensen vs Amy Penn / Stephanie Bonovich3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Lake Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.69
Joanne Latimer
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Michelle Corley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Meka Barry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Pomy Lewis
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Anne Marie Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Rose Perkinson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Lora Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Mitzi Bodie
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Gloria Palacios
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Suzanne Christensen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Judge-McRae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Perkinson + Gloria Palacios123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Marie Rasmussen + Gloria Palacios213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lake Bailey
45W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Joanne Latimer
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Michelle Corley
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Meka Barry
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Pomy Lewis
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Anne Marie Rasmussen
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Rose Perkinson
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Lora Boruff
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Mitzi Bodie
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.33
Gloria Palacios
14W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Suzanne Christensen
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Linda Judge-McRae
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.