Teams

SGV Padawans-GAMEZ-WN/SA

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesCesar Cortes / Gustavo Diaz Gamez vs Jimmy Tang / Eric Yeung5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesConner Stone vs Rong Huang4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndy Zang vs Tom Pudpai0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSergio Navarro / Changlin Wu vs Jared Leong / Jasen Ha3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesManuel Almazan vs Atish Mohanty6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGustavo Diaz Gamez vs Jon Pang6-1, 6-0
2025-04-27vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKezhi YAN / Gustavo Diaz Gamez vs Chun Wong / Ronald Yip0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesConner Stone vs Gabriel Zanipatin5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSergio Navarro vs Peter Hu2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSergio Navarro / Conner Stone vs Tyler Page / Yong Yoo2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesManuel Almazan vs Chipper Pastron6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCesar Cortes / John Gonzalez vs Alfred Navarro / Andrew Spiegel2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesNico Paolella vs Matthew Hoffman6-4, 6-5
L#3 DoublesChanglin Wu / Andy Zang vs Aaron Buckwalter / Daniel Sheehy1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Manuel Almazan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Nico Paolella
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.32
John Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cesar Cortes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Andy Zang
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.05
Sergio Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Conner Stone
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Changlin Wu
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Gustavo Diaz Gamez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kezhi YAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Zang + Changlin Wu11460% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Manuel Almazan
17W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Nico Paolella
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
John Gonzalez
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Cesar Cortes
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andy Zang
33W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Sergio Navarro
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Conner Stone
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Changlin Wu
17W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Gustavo Diaz Gamez
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kezhi YAN
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.