Teams

Di.King18M

2026 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-26vs Ki.Roberts18M2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesGrace Poole / Bryce Abernethy vs Deicy Love / Kurt Love6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDarsan Russo / Peter Russo vs Maggie Svendsen / Christian Felkl6-1, 6-2
2026-07-19vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Brooks / Lance Shrader vs Ryan Osswald / Isabella Stubbs0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Stephenson / Gustavo Conde vs Clarissa McMathis / varun nalam3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Gentry / Bryce Abernethy vs Beau Brakman / Kristine Rosette6-0, 7-5
2026-07-12vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Gentry / Bryce Abernethy vs Olivia Grieser / Len Swanson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Brooks / William Santa Rosa vs Jeanna Hastie / Ashish Meshram1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGrace Poole / Lance Shrader vs Roni J. / Ricardo Davalos6-0, 6-3
2026-07-05vs Ki.Roberts18M2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Haymore / Jarrod Haymore vs Maggie Svendsen / Richard Paschal6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Stephenson / Gustavo Conde vs MaryBeth Spoehr / Robert Cenzon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Brooks / Lance Shrader vs Jennifer Paschal / Christian Felkl6-1, 6-1
2026-06-14vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Poole / Nipul Shah vs Anu Bhagawan / Len Swanson1-2
L#2 DoublesErin Brooks / Lance Shrader vs William Murphy / Sophia Ewing0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Gentry / Bryce Abernethy vs Lawrence Pollard / Roni J.2-6, 2-6
2026-06-07vs Ki.Roberts18M2.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesAmanda Haymore / Bryce Abernethy vs Patricia Haver / Emmet Clark6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGrace Poole / Nipul Shah vs Deicy Love / Kurt Love6-2, 6-0
2026-05-31vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Gentry / Lance Shrader vs Isaias Barajas / Karla Esparza0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDarsan Russo / Peter Russo vs Ravikumar Perumal / Kristine Rosette1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Brooks / William Santa Rosa vs varun nalam / Isabella Stubbs2-6, 5-7
2026-05-24vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 12
W#1 DoublesGrace Poole / William Santa Rosa vs Hogan Ellis / Ebony Baylis6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Haymore / Jarrod Haymore vs Jeanna Hastie / Lawrence Pollard4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErin Brooks / Bryce Abernethy vs Olivia Grieser / Jeff Jugan0-6, 0-6
2026-05-17vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Russo / Darsan Russo vs Isaias Barajas / Karla Esparza4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Santa Rosa / Lauren Shelby vs varun nalam / Kristine Rosette7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJarrod Haymore / Amanda Haymore vs Brian Graham / Clarissa McMathis5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ra.Yasin18M8120715153
2De.Farmer18M2.57218921188
3Di.King18M36121532232
4Ki.Roberts18M2.50942346295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Jarrod Haymore
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Nipul Shah
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
William Santa Rosa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Lance Shrader
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.25
Grace Poole
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.19
Amanda Haymore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.13
Darsan Russo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Diane Bosnjak King
published 2.5
2.09
Ashley Stephenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Bryce Abernethy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.99
Lauren Shelby
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gustavo Conde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Russo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Stephenson + Gustavo Conde3253% gamesnot enough data
Darsan Russo + Peter Russo123 matchesnot enough data
William Santa Rosa + Lauren Shelby123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Haymore + Jarrod Haymore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jarrod Haymore
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Nipul Shah
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
William Santa Rosa
34W–81L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Lance Shrader
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Grace Poole
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Amanda Haymore
6W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Darsan Russo
67W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Diane Bosnjak King
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Ashley Stephenson
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Bryce Abernethy
3W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Lauren Shelby
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Gustavo Conde
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Russo
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.