Teams

ALACHUA/Pauly

2022 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesJosh Spink / Thomas Duffaut vs Jack Neubert / Brandon Jeong7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesJungyun Hwang vs Nidal Boughannam6-1, 6-3
2022-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJungyun Hwang / JD Wright vs Philip Karwacki / Wyatt Watford6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJungyun Hwang / JD Wright vs Brandon Jeong / Jack Neubert6-4, 7-6
2022-06-25vs JTC - CribbWon 20
W#1 DoublesJungyun Hwang / JD Wright vs John Lear / Josh Roberts4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJosh Spink / Thomas Duffaut vs Tedd Comerford / Ashok Kumar6-2, 7-5
2022-06-18vs DB - KarwackiWon 10
W#2 SinglesJungyun Hwang vs Juan Torres4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-03vs JTC - CribbLost 01
L#3 DoublesJungyun Hwang / Thomas Duffaut vs Newell Fox / John Lear5-7, 1-6
2022-05-27vs DB - KarwackiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Ho / Jungyun Hwang vs Jonathan Li / Nash Dean6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Josh Spink vs Jackson Songayab / Ashkan Paykar3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Alejandro Pauly
published 4.5
4.25
Eric Esterline
published 4.5
3.88
Jungyun Hwang
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.73
Josh Spink
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.56
Corey Sobers
published 4
3.55
Thomas Duffaut
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.37
Enrique Vargas
published 3.5
3.14
Jack Jacobs
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Spink + Thomas Duffaut4743% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Duffaut + Jungyun Hwang044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Pauly
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Jungyun Hwang
128W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Josh Spink
186W–129L career · 9 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Corey Sobers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Thomas Duffaut
194W–155L career · 7 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Enrique Vargas
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Jack Jacobs
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.