Teams

Franz/Scott 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.5 Women Singles Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesCameron Wannamaker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesCameron Wannamaker vs LaJean Morrow Smith6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMandi Clift vs Cassidy MacKay6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDeirdre Hjelt vs Jennifer Yates6-1, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllenoush Beard vs Jennifer Yates6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDeirdre Hjelt vs Cassidy MacKay6-1, 6-2
2026-06-24vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Chapman vs Kelen Walker6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDeirdre Hjelt vs Amy Bunch6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCameron Wannamaker vs Jennifer Murphy6-0, 6-3
2026-06-17vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllenoush Beard vs Monica Billingsley6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMandi Clift vs Cassidy MacKay6-2, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Hjelt vs Teri Bramsway7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKathy Falls vs Kelen Walker1-6, 4-6
2026-06-03vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesMandi Clift vs LaJean Morrow Smith6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKathy Falls vs Andrea Spencer6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDeirdre Hjelt vs Monica Billingsley6-2, 6-1
2026-05-27vs Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Chapman vs Teri Bramsway6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKimberly Franz vs Monica Billingsley6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women Singles Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Franz/Scott 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM802225107
2Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM0822244271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Allenoush Beard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Kimberly Franz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Cameron Wannamaker
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Mandi Clift
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Kathy Falls
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allenoush Beard
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Mandi Clift
27W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kathy Falls
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.