Teams

GJTC LSHARP

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - WS · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-15vs GJTC TKELLERLost 12
W#1 DoublesShane Chatfield / Tina Hulihee vs Nick Rutan / Isabel Manzanares6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Alano / Virginia McHugh vs Matt Miller / Miyuki Chovanetz3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Burdette / Denise Faber vs Brandon Keller / Taya McCallum4-6, 2-6
2024-05-09vs GJTC PDANIELSWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Sharp / Craig Burdette vs Jon King / Jennifer Thompson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia McHugh / Brian Alano vs Patti Daniels / Shane Daniels6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShane Chatfield / Tina Hulihee vs Heidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-08vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Alano / Virginia McHugh vs Carla Kohls / Steven Oberle6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDenise Faber / Craig Burdette vs John Hanna / Laureen Cantwell6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRandy Majors / Julie Faber vs Daniel MacDonald / Tara Marshall3-6, 4-6
2024-05-01vs GJTC LSMITHWon 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Faber / Shane Chatfield vs Dana Elliott / Andrew Limbach6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrian Alano / Virginia McHugh vs Whit Blair / Lisa Smith6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRandy Majors / Julie Faber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-24vs GJTC TKELLERLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Sharp / Craig Burdette vs Nick Rutan / Isabel Manzanares1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Tina Hulihee vs Brandon Keller / Taya McCallum2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Majors / Julie Faber vs Randy Hurshman / Amy Espinoza-Hurshman4-6, 1-6
2024-04-18vs GJTC PDANIELSWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Hulihee / Shane Chatfield vs Patti Daniels / Brian Wright6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDenise Faber / Craig Burdette vs David Pacini / Lisa Poudrier6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVirginia McHugh / Brian Alano vs David Fife / Jennifer Thompson7-6, 7-6
2024-04-17vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Sharp / Shane Chatfield vs Cheryl Riise / John Hanna2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVirginia McHugh / Brian Alano vs Mikael Jurkovic / Megan Barnhurst7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRandy Majors / Julie Faber vs Greg Anoia / Laureen Cantwell6-4, 6-1
2024-04-03vs GJTC LSMITHLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Alano / Virginia McHugh vs Andrew Limbach / Tracy Hughes5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRandy Majors / Julie Faber vs Lisa Smith / Creed Clayton1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Faber / Shane Chatfield vs Whit Blair / Dana Elliott6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Brian Alano
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.10
Julie Faber
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.77
Lisa Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Craig Burdette
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Denise Faber
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Tina Hulihee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Virginia McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Randy Majors
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shane Chatfield
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Burdette + Denise Faber4358% games+11.6% vs expected
Brian Alano + Julie Faber7161% games+2.7% vs expected
Virginia McHugh + Brian Alano101250% games−9.1% vs expected
Shane Chatfield + Tina Hulihee9551% gamesnot enough data
Shane Chatfield + Julie Faber5253% gamesnot enough data
Virginia McHugh + Shane Chatfield6063% gamesnot enough data
Craig Burdette + Julie Faber224 matchesnot enough data
Shane Chatfield + Denise Faber224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Alano
22W–18L career · type M · 7 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Julie Faber
82W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.10
Lisa Sharp
46W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
Craig Burdette
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Denise Faber
105W–96L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Tina Hulihee
72W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Virginia McHugh
108W–96L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Randy Majors
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shane Chatfield
31W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.