Teams

Nilsson

2024 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday · Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-04vs WilsonSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSue Nilsson vs Karin Arnold4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesShannon Leigh vs Christy Bixler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-26vs WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie Settle vs Chandra Bittner4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Ashley Littman6-3, 6-4
2024-02-19vs WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie Settle vs Chandra Bittner4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Christy Bixler2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-12vs WilsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesShannon Leigh vs Jolene Lopez0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesStephanie Settle vs Karin Arnold0-6, 4-6
2024-02-05vs WilsonLost 01
L#3 SinglesSue Nilsson vs Stephanie Yarmosh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-29vs WilsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesShannon Leigh vs Chandra Bittner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesStephanie Settle vs Jennifer Leibold6-0, 6-3
2024-01-22vs WilsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Leigh vs Carey Mottet4-6, 3-4
2024-01-15vs WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie Settle vs Karin Arnold1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jennifer Leibold6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Ursula Cox
published
2.92
Dalyah Ronzio
published 3
2.91
Stephanie Settle
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.88
Shannon Leigh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Sue Nilsson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keller
published
2.62
LOUISA WOODVILLE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Leigh + Ingrid Hunsicker3447% games+6.1% vs expected
Shannon Leigh + Stephanie Settle362153% games−0.1% vs expected
Stephanie Settle + Ingrid Hunsicker2343% games−0.9% vs expected
Shannon Leigh + Sue Nilsson6748% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Settle + Sue Nilsson3647% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ursula Cox
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Dalyah Ronzio
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Stephanie Settle
95W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Shannon Leigh
116W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Karen Keller
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
LOUISA WOODVILLE
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.