← Teams

THPRD-Christensen/Troung

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Steven Keo
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Gerry Nuthmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Russell Homewood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Wes Milligan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Dale Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Doug Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Norman Langston
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-10-31Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRobert Truong / Gerry Nuthmann vs Gerald Chase / Robert Wendland6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDale Christensen / James Lawrence vs Kevin Meier / William Hertford6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Norman Langston vs D Michael Jones / Jeff Anhaltzer6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Lawrence / Wes Milligan vs John Wallin / Rick Raivio6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDale Christensen / Robert Truong vs John Hapke / Augustin Belindean5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Keo / Doug Christensen vs Rolf Ellingsen / Mark Muckerheide1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGerry Nuthmann / Wes Milligan vs Robert Wendland / Dan Wolff7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Norman Langston vs William Hertford / Kevin Meier6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDale Christensen / Michael Saling vs D Michael Jones / Michael Feely6-4, 6-4
2021-10-10Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesGerry Nuthmann / Wes Milligan vs Steven Christenson / Tom Sloan7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Keo / Doug Christensen vs Ron Eiseman / Bill Henderson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGerry Nuthmann / Russell Homewood vs Donny Cablao / Brady Berry1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Doug Christensen vs Paul Harwood / Anish Vidyarthi6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNorman Langston / Steven Keo vs Craig Frasier / Charles Gebhardt7-6, 6-2
2021-09-25Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRobert Truong / Russell Homewood vs Gordon Osaka / Randy Boose6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Norman Langston vs Steve Harris / Edward Vranizan6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWes Milligan / Michael Saling vs Paul Laurent / James Lang6-3, 6-3
2021-09-18Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesWes Milligan / Gerry Nuthmann vs Edward Vranizan / Steve Harris6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDale Christensen / Michael Saling vs Bruce Robertson / Jonathan Harms6-2, 6-1
2021-09-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteven Keo / Doug Christensen vs Shawn Boyce / Brady Berry6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Truong / Gerry Nuthmann vs Craig Frasier / David Williams6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDale Christensen / James Lawrence vs Donny Cablao / Asish Das3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Steven Keo
45W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Gerry Nuthmann
27W–37L career
not enough data
—
3
Russell Homewood
12W–18L career · type A
0%46%54%
3.13
3.5
Wes Milligan
128W–77L career
51%49%0%
2.94
3
Dale Christensen
61W–64L career
0%87%13%
2.93
3
Doug Christensen
17W–18L career
not enough data
—
3
Norman Langston
28W–53L career
7%92%1%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.