Teams

OC Irvine Heritage Park - Irene

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 3.5 W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#2 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Dianne Tanger4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCHERIE SHARP vs Kimberly Madamba3-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesTatiane Hosotani Yamazaki vs Carmela Andrade2-6, 0-6
2025-12-06vs OC LLW LNRC - LijuanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMiki Sugiura vs Tracy Qin6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJenny Inoue vs Jamie Andersen4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLesley Nishigawara vs Jean Oh6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCHERIE SHARP vs Lydia Wong4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMiki Sugiura vs Marcela McKibben6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAi Freger vs Yuki Kato Maves6-0, 6-3
2025-10-26vs OC LLW LNRC - LijuanSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAi Freger vs Maureen Dominguez6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Tracy Qin6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Quynh Nghiem6-4, 5-2
L#2 SinglesJenny Inoue vs Tricia Bregman4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJenny Inoue vs Jesstine Jones0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLisabeth Grimm vs Marcela McKibben2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Liu Castleman vs Ola Jackson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLesley Nishigawara vs Jinny Sohn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Miki Sugiura
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Ai Freger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Lesley Nishigawara
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.39
Shannon Liu Castleman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Lisabeth Grimm
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jenny Inoue
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Lailai Ho
published
2.88
Tatiane Hosotani Yamazaki
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.84
CHERIE SHARP
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miki Sugiura + Ai Freger8070% gamesnot enough data
Lisabeth Grimm + Lailai Ho303 matchesnot enough data
Ai Freger + Jenny Inoue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Miki Sugiura
72W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
3.5
Ai Freger
61W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lesley Nishigawara
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Shannon Liu Castleman
26W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Lisabeth Grimm
63W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jenny Inoue
52W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lailai Ho
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tatiane Hosotani Yamazaki
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
CHERIE SHARP
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.