Teams

LifeTime Plano/Pho-Bednar W4.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

22 players · average NTRP 4.56 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-22vs Garland/Lu W4.5SWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarian Bednar / Laura Jacobi vs Heather Turck / Kristen Volz6-2, 6-2
2025-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Stokes / Emily McRae vs Sonia Moorthy / Melanie Finnegan6-4, 6-4
2025-04-26vs Greenhill/Perez W4.5SWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily McRae / Celesta Caldwell vs Kristin Crosswait / Dee Nicholson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Christy Vutam
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.41
Celesta Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Luisa Osorio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.38
Allison Parks
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.32
Yvon Pho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.31
Caitlin Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Marian Bednar
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.28
Keasha Behrman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.28
Ana Castano-Mears
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Rema Thyagarajan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.26
Traci Boddie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Sandy Mora
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.15
Audrey Wendel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Breann Fierro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Teri Ware
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Adriana Akhtar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Laura Jacobi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Julia Su
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Emily McRae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hayley Herman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Kristin Eggleston
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Rachel Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Wendel + Traci Boddie8360% games+3.9% vs expected
Allison Parks + Luisa Osorio5076% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Stokes + Luisa Osorio404 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Keasha Behrman123 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Mora + Adriana Akhtar123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Ware + Marian Bednar303 matchesnot enough data
Ana Castano-Mears + Luisa Osorio213 matchesnot enough data
Yvon Pho + Luisa Osorio303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
31W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Celesta Caldwell
31W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
Luisa Osorio
35W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
5
Allison Parks
19W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.38
Yvon Pho
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Caitlin Rhodes
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Marian Bednar
23W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Keasha Behrman
33W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Rema Thyagarajan
14W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Traci Boddie
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Sandy Mora
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Audrey Wendel
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Breann Fierro
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Teri Ware
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Adriana Akhtar
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
Laura Jacobi
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Julia Su
22W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Emily McRae
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hayley Herman
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Eggleston
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Stokes
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.