Teams

Macia

2024 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-21vs RubinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Gover / Ruth Go Fernando Randle vs Kim Hazel / Michelle Stas6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-12-14vs OparLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Pugh / Andaiye Hamilton vs Meaghan McHugh / Janet Opar0-6, 0-6
2024-12-08vs Net Assets 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hunter / Nicole Ifill vs Sherry Altman / Erin Kim3-6, 6-6
W#2 DoublesYvette Fontenot / Carol Gover vs Maureen Cook / Diana Heinze6-3, 6-3
2024-12-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Ifill / Alissa Neuhausen vs Lindsay Eberhart / Andrea Motley6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAlissa Neuhausen / Carol Gover vs Mekkla Thompson / Winny Zhang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hunter / Nicole Ifill vs Na Yi / Chanpen Teeranon4-6, 3-3
2024-11-02vs Net Assets 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Ifill / Elizabeth Hunter vs Maureen Cook / Lynn Pendergast6-2, 6-7
L#1 DoublesCarol Gover / Liz Price vs Carmen Scurato / Lydia Juh2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elizabeth Hunter
published
3.52
Nicole Ifill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.32
Carol Gover
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Andaiye Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.22
Betsy Mencher
published 3.5
3.20
2.95
Dora Macia
published
2.88
Telesia Hundley
published
Elizabeth Pugh
published
Marjorie Goldman
published
Rosanne Johnston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Gover + Nicole Ifill2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Hunter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Nicole Ifill
253W–215L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Carol Gover
120W–213L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andaiye Hamilton
305W–151L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsy Mencher
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Telesia Hundley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Elizabeth Pugh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marjorie Goldman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosanne Johnston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.