Teams

Kontoulas/Toomey (Day)

2023 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Womens 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-30vs Sample/JeffersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Lisa Toomey vs Maureen Fehrs / Stephanie Markley4-6, 0-6
2023-09-25vs Cesareo/Moran (DAY) SJWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Andrea Zoller vs Tayna Jones / Kim Cesareo3-6, 0-2
2023-09-16vs Datesman/JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Martin / Lisa Toomey vs Joan Cozza / Annette Greene6-2, 6-3
2023-09-11vs Lemmons (Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Lisa Toomey vs Uschi Raboese / Juanita Johnson7-6, 7-5
2023-08-16vs Datesman/JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Lisa Toomey vs Kathleen Graeser / Heather Kallas6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Melissa Martin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Clarke Weidlein
published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Toomey
published
Ann Lagasse
published 3.5
Bett Lewis
published 3.5
3.01
Andrea Zoller
published 3
3.01
Karen O'Connor
published
2.92
Becky Welch
published 3
Cathy Murawski
published 3
2.68
Kimberly Sheahan
published
2.51
Karen Kontoulas
published
Elsa Murphy
published
Laura Kogler
published
Shelly Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen O'Connor + Andrea Zoller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Martin
58W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Clarke Weidlein
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Lisa Toomey
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ann Lagasse
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Bett Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Andrea Zoller
13W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Karen O'Connor
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Becky Welch
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Cathy Murawski
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Sheahan
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Karen Kontoulas
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Elsa Murphy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Kogler
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelly Barnes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.