Teams

LLKI-King/HNP

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 7.5 Men Thurs PM 18s

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-22vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJawad Shoaib / Larry Gao vs Hunter Carlton / Caleb OBriant7-6, 6-3
2025-10-09vs LJFE-Fernandez-Han/NMP BAILEYWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Steed / Jay Reese vs Anhtuan Nguyen / Julius Fernandez6-2, 6-2
2025-10-08vs LDBA_Baker/NMP 18+ 7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesJaikishan Lakhani / Mario Henry vs Nate Roller / Cole Wilson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Steed / Kevin Yohe vs Matthew Borcich / Todd Larsen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWarren Stanton / Larry Gao vs Sreejith Sreedharan / Andres Rendon7-5, 6-2
2025-10-02vs LVSA-Sampoornam/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Steed / Kevin Yohe vs Hayden Tuttle / James Thompson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartin Jackson / Jay Reese vs Prakhar Paharia / Sacheen Shrestha5-7, 5-7
2025-09-18vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 20
W#2 DoublesMartin Jackson / Mario Henry vs Alex Orr / Aiden Orr6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWarren Stanton / Larry Gao vs Robert Bachner / Caleb OBriant6-3, 6-2
2025-09-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesJaikishan Lakhani / Mario Henry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-04vs LJSC-Schrand/RR 18 M 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesWarren Stanton / Larry Gao vs Miguel Monguilod / Justin Wells6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJaikishan Lakhani / Mario Henry vs Jackson Suber / Christopher Endsjo6-2, 7-6
2025-08-21vs LJFE-Fernandez-Han/NMP BAILEYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaikishan Lakhani / Mario Henry vs Simon Ling / Fortunato Uy6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men Thurs PM 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Lance King
published
3.93
Jeffrey Steed
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Warren Stanton
published
3.76
Martin Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Babak Shoja
published 4
3.66
Jaikishan Lakhani
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Larry Gao
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Justin Blue
published
Lamont Spooner
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lance King
24W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Jeffrey Steed
40W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Warren Stanton
28W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
4
Martin Jackson
57W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Babak Shoja
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Jaikishan Lakhani
38W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Larry Gao
62W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Justin Blue
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lamont Spooner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.