Teams

PRKR RED

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs PCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesToni Payne / Darlene Odean vs Carolyn Watson / Patsy Botts6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Cindi Turchik vs Colleen Schwarz / Deborah Egan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-09vs PRC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Toni Payne vs Sharon Kisch / Birgitte Sandgaard3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Beth Laverenz vs Vicky M Martin / Teresa Crystal3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-02vs PCRK BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Darlene Odean vs Theresa Murray / Hillary Robben6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRUTH HERRE / Alyson Tittman vs Kathy McDonald / Shirlee Lindgren7-6, 6-1
2023-05-26vs CPV NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDarlene Odean / Toni Payne vs Karen Lang / Andrea Smart6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Beth Laverenz vs Jill Skinner / Betsy Heggie1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-19vs CACI PINKWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Myrna Sobernheim vs Amy Lange / Kathy Piquette6-3, 7-6
2023-05-12vs PCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Darlene Odean vs Colleen Schwarz / Carolyn Watson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-05vs PRC ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Alyson Tittman vs Michele Shaw / Sharon Kisch3-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Laverenz / Darlene Odean vs Lori Lee / Vicky M Martin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindi Turchik
published 3
2.64
Alyson Tittman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Beth Laverenz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Darlene Odean
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Elizabeth Stemper
published
Toni Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyson Tittman + Cindi Turchik2346% games+1.2% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Beth Laverenz111251% games−0.4% vs expected
Alyson Tittman + Beth Laverenz51045% games−6.6% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Alyson Tittman4740% games−12.3% vs expected
Darlene Odean + Toni Payne7263% gamesnot enough data
Beth Laverenz + Cindi Turchik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindi Turchik
14W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Alyson Tittman
115W–152L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Beth Laverenz
57W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Darlene Odean
85W–86L career · 5 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Elizabeth Stemper
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Toni Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.