Teams

BC-LLW-MCC/AmandaWest

2022 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Pamela Lopez
published
3.26
Caroline Payne
published 3.5
3.25
Amanda West
published 3.5
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
published
3.02
Donna Hughes
published 3.5
3.00
Tiffany Chen
published
2.97
Carly Feingold
published 3
2.91
2.86
2.69
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.38
Staci Carey
published
Julie Fields
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Maloney + Staci Carey3537% gamesnot enough data
Amanda West + Janet Zuccarini044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Caroline Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Caroline Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donna Hughes
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Tiffany Chen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Carly Feingold
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Elizabeth Riddell
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Staci Carey
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.