Teams

LTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-24vs HIW REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Liz Hafer vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Amanda Corrigan6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Rhonda Wilson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Johanson / Karin Hoal vs Kelly Murphy / Madeline Schymanski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Jennifer Kramer vs Kimberly Easton / Megan Curtiss6-3, 6-3
2022-07-19vs RHCC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Erika Vincent vs Maria Lucas / Rebecca Jones6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Jessica Tsuo1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKarin Hoal / Brigid McClaire vs Melissa Pugh / Amelia Hendrickson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Kristen Philbrook vs Terri Lombardi / Jennifer Curtis-Jones0-6, 1-6
2022-07-12vs NJ NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Jennifer Kramer vs Kathy Hardin / Julie Steven5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Nicole Cotta4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Karin Hoal vs Laura Kelly / Anne Townsel7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-28vs MVCC SILVERWon 40
W#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Jennifer Kramer vs Mary Elizabeth Frederick / Karen Lebeau7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Emily Crowder6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Mary Johanson vs Stephanie Whitman / Julie Levey6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Erika Vincent vs Linda Lea / Margaret Lea6-1, 6-1
2022-06-21vs NJ PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesKristen Philbrook / Judith McKinney vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Patti Warner0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Sara Leaver4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Hafer / Karen Noreyko vs Diane Hedberg / Sarah Weill2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Betsy Duryea vs Rebecca Glatz / Elizabeth Jones6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-14vs BP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Erika Vincent vs Melanie Escobar / Emily Adams6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Katarzyna Kowerska3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Liz Hafer vs Mara Orchard / Erin Heltshe7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Adams / Karin Hoal vs Adrienne Beall / Skeeter Buck6-0, 6-2
2022-06-07vs MC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Judith McKinney vs Annmarie Oien / Kirsten Sharer7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Ciel Lawrence6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Erika Vincent vs Jackie Greiner / Michelle Murphy6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Karin Hoal vs Luann Mcclure / Elsa Zimmerer6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Erika Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Becky Adams
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Judith McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brigid McClaire
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Mary Johanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Philbrook
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.43
Betsy Duryea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Noreyko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Karin Hoal
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Liz Hafer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Johanson + Judith McKinney9554% games+8.3% vs expected
Karen Noreyko + Liz Hafer141947% games+1.0% vs expected
Mary Johanson + Karen Noreyko2342% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Duryea + Erika Vincent404 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Duryea + Kristen Philbrook123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Vincent
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Becky Adams
45W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Judith McKinney
48W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brigid McClaire
38W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Mary Johanson
37W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Kristen Philbrook
30W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Betsy Duryea
35W–36L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Karen Noreyko
29W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Hoal
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liz Hafer
24W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.