Teams

Thoma/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-03vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Emily Johnson vs Suzanne Camping / Heather Gipson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Pierre vs Lauren King Saatkamp4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Thoma / Leigh Ann Portale vs Mary Margaret Behncke / Kristin Viars6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Stewart / CARMEN KING vs Lissa Vestevich / Elisa Goodrich0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#4 DoublesNicky Nash / Stacia Hadley vs Becky Schneider / Angelique Hopper1-6, 1-6
2026-03-31vs Ouellette/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Emily Johnson vs Melinda Senna / Leigh Ann Corley5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Pierre vs Jaclyn Carney2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Bracken / Nobu Junge vs Katie Ouellette / Angie Wesley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Portale / Kim Thoma vs Katherine Church / Jennifer Lucas2-6, 0-6
2026-03-27vs Kumar/Plumlee/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Kim Thoma vs Susan Manley / Liz Grabarits2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesColleen Bracken vs Jenifer Lodge1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCARMEN KING / Nobu Junge vs Sarah Dorr / Kelly Brandon0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Pierre / Nicky Nash vs Kathy McCabe / Teresa Hamilton1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-06vs Simpson/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Leola Meiners vs Julie Burnstein / Julie Hatcher2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Pierre vs Jessica Brende3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNobu Junge / Nicky Nash vs Poonam Kabaria / Maryam Khan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Stewart / Leigh Ann Portale vs Julie Dearman / Caroline Bryan3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesCARMEN KING / Colleen Bracken vs Nancy Russell / Sandra Rudd2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Renee Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Courtney Irving
published 3
2.94
Nobu Junge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Emily Pierre
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Leigh Ann Portale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
CARMEN KING
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kelli Alarcon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Arnita Ozgener
published 3
2.64
Kim Thoma
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Colleen Bracken
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Stacia Hadley
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Heather Cooley
published
2.46
Nicky Nash
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Leola Meiners
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Ann Portale + Nobu Junge314 matchesnot enough data
Stacia Hadley + Nicky Nash134 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Alarcon + Arnita Ozgener123 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Alarcon + Nobu Junge213 matchesnot enough data
CARMEN KING + Nobu Junge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Stewart
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Courtney Irving
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Nobu Junge
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Emily Pierre
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Leigh Ann Portale
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
CARMEN KING
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kelli Alarcon
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Arnita Ozgener
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Kim Thoma
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Colleen Bracken
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Stacia Hadley
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Heather Cooley
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Nicky Nash
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Leola Meiners
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.