Teams

DBuchman (Russell)

2025 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-10vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Buchman / Leila Tissue vs Nicole Morris / Lisa Riggins3-6, 4-6
2025-04-04vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeila Tissue / Donna Buchman vs Debbie Carmazzi / Rosemary Hill6-4, 7-5
2025-03-21vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Dunn / Maebeth Hill vs Carol Almond / JoAnn Crolley1-6, 6-7
2025-03-14vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaebeth Hill / Irene Kossack vs Rosemary Hill / Lisa Riggins1-6, 1-6
2025-03-07vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Buchman / Ann Lacarter vs Saundra Denny / Robin Edwards3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPATRICIA DRIES / Maebeth Hill vs Lisa Riggins / Niki Scott1-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis NC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Lacarter / Donna Buchman vs Janet Baker / Ruth Shaffner2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaebeth Hill / PATRICIA DRIES vs Rosemary Hill / Lisa Riggins3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Leila Tissue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Ann Lacarter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Nancy Dunn
published
3.40
PATRICIA DRIES
published
3.26
Maebeth Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Donna Buchman
published
3.20
Kate Palanica
published
3.06
Teresa Brown
published
Karol Kreshon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maebeth Hill + Leila Tissue2450% gamesnot enough data
Maebeth Hill + Nancy Dunn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leila Tissue
108W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Ann Lacarter
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Nancy Dunn
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
PATRICIA DRIES
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Maebeth Hill
48W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Donna Buchman
4W–20L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
Kate Palanica
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Teresa Brown
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Karol Kreshon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.