Teams

TCSP-Twelve Pack with Shots-Ford

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.27 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-03vs MC-Bad Doggies 2-HinojosaLost 04
L#1 DoublesDan Holland / Philip Rezek vs Suhas Gulur Ramakrishna / Vijay Byndoor3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBruce James / Mike Bursiek vs Santosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Aalfs vs Terrence Seet1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Miller / Len Kannapell vs Adrian Seet / Sathiya Maripitchai4-6, 2-6
2022-05-29vs RBW-Long Shots-FerreWon 32
W#1 DoublesRyan Bussard / Mike Bursiek vs Tim Flood / Stefko Kostadinov6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDan Holland vs Humberto Hernandez4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSimon Zeng / Bruce James vs Andy Rivas / Harben Mahil6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Aalfs vs Eddy Ferre1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrent Baker / Michael Ford vs John Raffetto / Dhiraj Madan3-6, 3-6
2022-05-21vs CP-Three Oh-AllisonWon 41
W#1 DoublesRyan Bussard / Michael Rodden vs Tony Balkan / Justin VonGortler3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEvan Lerer vs Tony Zhao4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Bursiek / Matthew Day vs Bob Isaacson / Robert Bengford6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Aalfs vs Xin Che2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Ford / Len Kannapell vs Joseph Allison / Mike McKay6-3, 6-0
2022-05-15vs WSC-Team Lash 3.0 18+Won 31
W#1 DoublesRyan Bussard / Matthew Day vs Hugo Aponte / Hans Lund6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce James / Len Kannapell vs Min Liu / Paul Bifford7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMatthew Aalfs vs Alexandru Gavrilescu3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDan Holland / Michael Ford vs Tom Lash / Ioan Smintina6-3, 6-2
2022-05-08vs ETC-TopSpinners-AjoySplit 22
L#1 DoublesPhilip Rezek / Chris Porter vs Jonathan Brown / Jeffrey Ma3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLen Kannapell / Scott Miller vs Matt Dunbar / Ajoy Krishnamoorthy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDan Holland vs Anthony Koruga6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrent Baker / Matthew Day vs Vincent Keane / Stephen Rising6-4, 6-4
2022-05-07vs PL-WoodWon 32
L#1 DoublesSimon Zeng / Ryan Bussard vs Scott Fletcher / Tom Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEvan Lerer vs Patrick Lamoria6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLen Kannapell / Scott Miller vs Matthew Carter / Brad Campbell2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Ford vs Peter Breining3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDion Hutchings / Mike Bursiek vs Rahul Ohri / Tim Hanson6-4, 6-4
2022-04-30vs HBSQ-Frog and Volley-BorgidaWon 41
W#1 DoublesDan Holland / Philip Rezek vs Jeffry Borgida / Keith Abernathy6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEvan Lerer vs DANIEL MAHONEY6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMike Bursiek / Bruce James vs Darrel Rich / Jeff Mcdowell6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMatthew Aalfs vs Chris Serwold7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesScott Miller / Brent Baker vs Thomas O'Rourke / William Uran4-6, 3-6
2022-04-24vs ETC-Titans-BoxLost 23
L#1 DoublesRyan Bussard / Michael Rodden vs Samuele Carpineti / Carlos Apacible3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Ford vs Brandon Nott6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhilip Rezek / Dan Holland vs David Halgren / Steven Ehrlich0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Day vs Patrick Formanes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLen Kannapell / Bruce James vs Kurt Hicklin / Jerel Navarrete6-3, 6-4
2022-04-16vs FC-DevarapalliWon 31
W#1 DoublesRyan Bussard / Michael Rodden vs Kshitij Gaipal / Nicolai Petersen6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEvan Lerer vs Venkatnath Devarapalli6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Porter / Matthew Day vs Ryan Froondozo / Fredrik Johansson6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Ford / Dion Hutchings vs Wilfred Amsden / Mark Eshom3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MC-Bad Doggies 2-Hinojosa9039622310
2EDG-Edgers-Purkis90321333322
3WSC-Phoenix-Agrawal81341130317
4ETC-Hawkins81311432332
5ETC-Titans-Box72331228273
6WSC-Wolfpack-Yang72311433305
7CP-Three Oh-Allison72252047394
8PL-Aces and Lobs-Wadhwa63311431319
9TCSP-Twelve Pack with Shots-Ford63261944381
10TCSP-Au Yeung63232249388
11RBW-Long Shots-Ferre54252048397
12TCSP-Wang45222352425
13PSC-Ave Cezar-Clinciu35211945373
14FC-Devarapalli36202556445
15AYTC-STA-Thompson36162964430
16CP-BarelyMadeIt-Parastatidis27153064436
17WSC-Team Lash 3.0 18+27153065448
18AYTC-Chip and Charge-Buscher0954080511

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Matthew Day
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Evan Lerer
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.34
Mike Bursiek
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Holland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Ryan Bussard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Michael Rodden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Bruce James
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Matthew Aalfs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.53
Philip Rezek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Brent Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.10
Dion Hutchings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Len Kannapell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Ford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Bussard + Dan Holland5451% games+12.9% vs expected
Matthew Day + Mike Bursiek18858% games+12.1% vs expected
Dan Holland + Mike Bursiek4455% games+6.2% vs expected
Philip Rezek + Dan Holland8751% games+3.9% vs expected
Ryan Bussard + Michael Rodden101047% games+3.1% vs expected
Philip Rezek + Len Kannapell3352% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Aalfs + Philip Rezek044 matchesnot enough data
Dan Holland + Evan Lerer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matthew Day
113W–75L career · 12 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Evan Lerer
73W–79L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Mike Bursiek
88W–60L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Dan Holland
68W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ryan Bussard
57W–72L career · 9 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Michael Rodden
18W–28L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Bruce James
76W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Matthew Aalfs
19W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Philip Rezek
22W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Brent Baker
15W–82L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Dion Hutchings
7W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Len Kannapell
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Ford
13W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.