Teams

Rosenthal/Deininger Atkinson-Stern N.O. Day 3.5

2022 NO Adult 40 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Julie Steigner
published
Celia Deininger
published 3.5
3.07
Lydia Cutrer
published
2.75
Sandy Rosenthal
published
Catherine Lyman
published 3
Charlotte Bracey
published 3
Jackie Shreves
published 3
2.53
Julianne Leblanc
published
Linda Bordelon
published
Mary Hanemann
published
Nancy Scobel
published
Susan Lang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Bracey + Celia Deininger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Steigner
66W–53L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Celia Deininger
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lydia Cutrer
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Sandy Rosenthal
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Catherine Lyman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Charlotte Bracey
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Jackie Shreves
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julianne Leblanc
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Linda Bordelon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Hanemann
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Scobel
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Lang
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.