Teams

Pizza Party (Flexible)

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-04vs Kiss my Aces (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Forbes / Lori van Holmes vs Molly Klein / Sue Rentschler0-6, 1-6
2023-07-26vs FourthsomeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Vana / Dayna Eberhardt vs Irena Urbas / Traci Huffer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesDayna Eberhardt / Jennifer Vana vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-17vs MeowhemLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori van Holmes / Dayna Eberhardt vs Genevieve Lim / Rei Schultz1-6, 3-6
2023-07-16vs KedroskeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoanna Forbes / Lori van Holmes vs Hien Nguyen / Karalyn Kedroske6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-12vs Over 40 Love (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori van Holmes / Jennifer Vana vs Chutimont Blacksmith / Cheryl Capriola1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings47 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13C6060129
2MICC Summer Fun6060247
3Lang/Fried/Stark5050127
4*SHINE* - Koves (Flexible)5151231
5My lucky Charms5151244
6Shank You Very Much (Flexible)5151242
7NWW-Haluptzok5151342
8Kiss my Aces (Flexible)5151332
9Fourthsome5151440
10NWW-Tousley4141438
11Whoops! (Flexible)4242446
12Over 40 Love (Flexible)4242429
13Meowhem4242441
14Summer Sets (Flexible)4242553
15Joh4242652
16Pham 4.04242766
17Summer Sets3232437
18Invisible Strings3232443
19Havin' a ball3232646
20NetTonightDear3232647
21Suh3333550
22Wizards of AUS3333650
23GLaM girlz3333754
24Hit it (Flexible)3333751
25Networthy3333862
26Anderson (Flexible)3333857
27Taylor (Flexible)3333959
28Eichenlaub-Kraus2323652
29H2O2323748
30Eat Play Lob2323748
31Kornblum2323853
32SventyPercent2323857
33Pizza Party (Flexible)2424955
34Tennis Peaches (Flexible)2424963
35STC - SMENCK24241072
36We're Back! - Rodden/Wickham1414851
37Net Gains-Crews1414854
38Refreshers 4.01414846
39Dunlop (Flexible)15151058
40SkipWood15151069
41Kedroske15151061
42CP-summer-gals (Flexible)15151169
43Ace Freely05051058
44Nothing but Net06061170
45Balls on Fire (Flexible)06061265
46Ledshamz06061272
47Game Set Wine06061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jennifer Vana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Dayna Eberhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Joanna Forbes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Lori van Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Vana
148W–145L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Dayna Eberhardt
69W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Joanna Forbes
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Lori van Holmes
59W–101L career · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.