Teams

Baxter/O'Connor 6.5 55+

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Men 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-03vs nguyen/williamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoug MacCall / Fred Broyles vs Rick Chambers / Jeff Hilton7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChip Yost / Scott Dotson vs Hiep Nguyen / David Filios0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Restione / William Baxter vs Son Nguyen / Robert Pelosi6-2, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Wise - DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesFred Broyles / Craig Yoon vs Thomas Brown / Robert Bredeck6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrett Arseneault / Edward Pringle vs Mike Richez / Peter Haley6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDanny Ketola / Daniel Weese vs James Textoris / Brian Scott1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Doug MacCall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Edward Pringle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
David Restione
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Chip Yost
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Fred Broyles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Mark Bradcovich
published
3.15
Timothy O'Connor
published
3.04
William Baxter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Daniel Weese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Craig Yoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Brett Arseneault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Scott Dotson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Danny Ketola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fred Broyles + Brett Arseneault404 matchesnot enough data
William Baxter + Fred Broyles303 matchesnot enough data
William Baxter + David Restione213 matchesnot enough data
Danny Ketola + Craig Yoon033 matchesnot enough data
Scott Dotson + Doug MacCall123 matchesnot enough data
Chip Yost + Mark Bradcovich123 matchesnot enough data
Mark Bradcovich + David Restione123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug MacCall
40W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Edward Pringle
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Restione
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chip Yost
24W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Fred Broyles
41W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
Mark Bradcovich
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Timothy O'Connor
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
William Baxter
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Daniel Weese
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Craig Yoon
1W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Brett Arseneault
32W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
Scott Dotson
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Danny Ketola
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.