Teams

ACAC-Parker

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs RAIN-CheekLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Kasten / Barbara Kasten vs James Andrews / Molly Smith2-6, 3-6
2022-03-20vs WO-HamlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Kasten / Barbara Kasten vs Tyler Franks / Kelly Beazley6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Gittelman / Martinique Kandl vs Raymond Cargill / Colette Christianson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTully Parker / Barbara Kasten vs Rachel Piacentini / Bryan Piacentini4-6, 2-1, 0-1
2022-03-05vs BURK-BrockLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Tully Parker vs Beth Krider / John Dages7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-27vs SAL-GrayWon 10
W#1 DoublesTully Parker / Barbara Kasten vs Jay Honse / Colleen Quattlebaum4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-26vs MAC-ChronisWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Young / Martinique Kandl vs Todd Manning / Betty Thompson6-4, 6-4
2022-02-20vs RAIN-LyonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Tim Kasten vs Jared Gnazzo / Marcy Gnazzo6-0, 6-0
2022-01-23vs ACAC-BlackburnWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Kasten / Barbara Kasten vs Matthew Cox / Jane Parrish6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Dave Bucheit
published 3.5
3.32
Tim Kasten
published
3.31
John Kosco
published
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.25
Barbara Kasten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Craig Gittelman
published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Funk
published
2.92
K C Funk
published
2.82
Mari Litz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Dave Bucheit
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Tim Kasten
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
John Kosco
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Kasten
158W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Craig Gittelman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
K C Funk
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mari Litz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.